
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs FirePro S10000

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

FirePro S10000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S10000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (305mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro S10000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and FirePro S10000

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the FirePro S10000 reaches 4,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro S10000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 4,096 (FirePro S10000). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,498 | 4,537 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4096 ×2+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz+6% | 950 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro S10000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S10000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the FirePro S10000's 375W — a 140.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 350W (FirePro S10000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-83% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2+472% | 12.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 and now averages $500. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 9.1 (FirePro S10000) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | Tahiti |
| Release | April 24 2018 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #464 | #461 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















