Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Quadro P1000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Quadro P1000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Quadro P1000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro P1000

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1519 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Quadro P1000
G3D Mark Score	4,498	4,495
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+100%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.588 TFLOPS+66%	1.555 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1011 MHz	1519 MHz+50%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Quadro P1000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Quadro P1000
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Quadro P1000
TDP	65W	40W-38%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	69.2	112.4+62%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).