
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 140T remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 2350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,498 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 1280+15900% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 2350 MHz+132% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 60% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 35W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2 | 128.6+86% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | — |
| Release | April 24 2018 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #464 | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















