Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Nano lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Nano is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Radeon R9 Nano
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 Nano remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Nano Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 Nano

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	4,498	4,609+2%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.588 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS+217%
Boost Clock	1011 MHz+1%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	1 MB+223%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 Nano offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Bus Width	64-bit	4096-bit+6300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 91.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 8-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	65W-63%	175W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	550W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 8-pin
Length	—	152mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	69.2+163%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649 and now averages $200. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 23.0 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).