
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Nano across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Nano
2015Why buy it
- ✅38.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 Nano is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,498 | 4,609+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4096+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS+217% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz+1% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 1 MB+223% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 Nano gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 4096-bit+6300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 91.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-63% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 152mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2+163% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 7.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | Fiji |
| Release | April 24 2018 | August 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #464 | #306 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















