Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Nano across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

  • 38.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 Nano is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,498), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 Nano is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Nano makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLRadeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score
4,498
4,609+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.588 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS+217%
Boost Clock
1011 MHz+1%
1000 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
256+220%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
1 MB+223%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLRadeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 Nano gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLRadeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Bus Width
64-bit
4096-bit+6300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 91.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLRadeon R9 Nano
TDP
65W-63%
175W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 8-pin
Length
152mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
69.2+163%
26.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLRadeon R9 Nano
MSRP
$0-100%
$649
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
7.1
Codename
Polaris 22
Fiji
Release
April 24 2018
August 27 2015
Ranking
#464
#306

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.