
Radeon Pro 465

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 465 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2018Why buy it
- ✅20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,498 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 2.588 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1011 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. Radeon Pro 465 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 60% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-46% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7+87% | 69.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 465 came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Baffin | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | April 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #547 | #464 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















