Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1519 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P1000

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 65W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

  • 38.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 62.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (4,498 vs 4,495), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P1000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score
4,495
4,498
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.555 TFLOPS
2.588 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock
1519 MHz+50%
1011 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P1000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. Quadro P1000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P1000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP
40W-38%
65W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
112.4+62%
69.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P1000 came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro P1000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GP107
Polaris 22
Release
February 7 2017
April 24 2018
Ranking
#466
#464

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.