Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P1000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,495	4,498
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.555 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock	1519 MHz+50%	1011 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L1 Cache	192 KB	320 KB+67%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP	40W-38%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	112.4+62%	69.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).