
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Quadro P1000

GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P1000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $500), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 522.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+522.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and Quadro P1000

GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,514 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+210% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1519 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1 | 112.4+459% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Quadro P1000 costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers 524.4% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $80-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 56.2+524% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #505 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












