Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P1000

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅15.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (4,538 vs 4,495), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P1000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score	4,495	4,538
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.555 TFLOPS	1.858 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock	1519 MHz+67%	907 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P1000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 carries 2 GB. Quadro P1000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P1000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 13.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro 465
TDP	40W	35W-13%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	112.4	129.7+15%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P1000 came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P1000 was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro P1000) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Quadro P1000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P1000 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro P1000	Radeon Pro 465
MSRP	$0-100%	$500
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	9.1
Codename	GP107	Baffin
Release	February 7 2017	October 30 2016
Ranking	#466	#547

Search Quadro P1000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.