
Radeon R3E vs GeForce GT 220

Radeon R3E
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R3E is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon R3E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 220 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R3E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R3E offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT 220.
| Insight | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R3E and GeForce GT 220

Radeon R3E
The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R3E scores 225 and the GeForce GT 220 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R3E is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GT 220 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R3E) vs 240 (GeForce GT 220). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220).
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 225+1% | 222 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+113% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+100% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R3E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R3E) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 220) — the Radeon R3E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R3E) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3E) vs No (GeForce GT 220). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R3E draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 220's 236W — a 130.1% difference. The Radeon R3E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R3E) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-79% | 236W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+400% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R3E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Radeon R3E) vs 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) — the Radeon R3E offers 2.2% better value. The Radeon R3E is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R3E | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $69 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GT200 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #757 | #802 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











