Radeon R3E
VS
Quadro FX 880M

Radeon R3E vs Quadro FX 880M

AMD

Radeon R3E

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 880M

#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
100%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
92%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
87%
#112
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1247%
#127
Quadro FX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
97%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
94%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
93%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
90%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
90%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
90%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
84%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
84%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
83%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R3E is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon R3E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R3E.

InsightRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%)
Leading raw performance (+5.3%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 880M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R3E and Quadro FX 880M

AMD

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R3E scores 225 versus the Quadro FX 880M's 237 — the Quadro FX 880M leads by 5.3%. The Radeon R3E is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro FX 880M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R3E) vs 240 (Quadro FX 880M). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 880M).

FeatureRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
G3D Mark Score
225
237+5%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
512+113%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.247 TFLOPS+100%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R3E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 880M has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 880M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R3E) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 880M) — the Radeon R3E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R3E draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 880M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R3E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R3E) vs 350W (Quadro FX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
4.5+246%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R3E is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon R3EQuadro FX 880M
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
Codename
Polaris 23
GT200B
Release
May 13 2019
November 11 2008
Ranking
#757
#815