Radeon R3E vs Quadro FX 4500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R3E is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon R3E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R3E.

Insight	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R3E offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 4500, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 911.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+911.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R3E Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 4500 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R3E and Quadro FX 4500

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

Quadro FX 4500

The Quadro FX 4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 227 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R3E scores 225 and the Quadro FX 4500 reaches 227 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R3E is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro FX 4500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R3E) vs 240 (Quadro FX 4500). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500).

Feature	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
G3D Mark Score	225	227
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512+113%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+100%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R3E) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 4500) — the Radeon R3E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R3E) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 4500). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
DirectX	12_0+33%	9_0c
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R3E draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 4500's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R3E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R3E) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 230mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R3E	Quadro FX 4500
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	230mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	4.5+275%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R3E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 4500 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon R3E costs 90.2% less ($451 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (Radeon R3E) vs 0.5 (Quadro FX 4500) — the Radeon R3E offers 820% better value. The Radeon R3E is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).