Radeon R5 340 vs GRID K220Q
Radeon R5 340
Popular choices:
GRID K220Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 340 is positioned at rank 136 and the GRID K220Q is on rank 299, so the Radeon R5 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 340
Performance Per Dollar GRID K220Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K220Q.
| Insight | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (265mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 64% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 340 and GRID K220Q
Radeon R5 340
The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.
GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 340 scores 935 and the GRID K220Q reaches 912 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 340 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID K220Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 340) vs 1,536 (GRID K220Q). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q).
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 935+3% | 912 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+152% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 340 draws 50W versus the GRID K220Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R5 340) vs 350W (GRID K220Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 265mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+356% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 340 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GRID K220Q launched at $469 and now averages $40. The Radeon R5 340 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.4 (Radeon R5 340) vs 22.8 (GRID K220Q) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 64% better value. The Radeon R5 340 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-79% | $469 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-38% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+64% | 22.8 |
| Codename | Lexa | GK104 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | July 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #773 | #907 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 340 and GRID K220Q
