Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon 6750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 340 is positioned at rank 136 and the Radeon 6750M is on rank 182, so the Radeon R5 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 340

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

768%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

738%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

730%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

728%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

727%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

723%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

714%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

711%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

704%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

703%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

694%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

693%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

680%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

680%

#85

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

99%

#86

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

97%

#121

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

847%

#136

Radeon R5 340

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

100%

#137

Radeon HD 8570

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#139

GeForce GT 730

MSRP: $89|Avg: $45

98%

#140

Radeon HD 8400E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

97%

#142

Radeon HD 8400

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

96%

#143

Radeon HD 5750

MSRP: $130|Avg: $25

95%

#145

Radeon HD 8330E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

92%

#146

Radeon HD 8670D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

91%

#147

Radeon R7 A370

MSRP: $149|Avg: $51

91%

#148

Radeon HD 5770

MSRP: $159|Avg: $159

90%

#149

Radeon HD 4770

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

88%

#150

Radeon HD 8510G

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

88%

#151

Radeon HD 8550G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M

#172

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

357%

#174

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

324%

#175

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

323%

#179

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

294%

#180

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

292%

#182

Radeon 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#183

GeForce GT 525M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#186

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#187

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

93%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R5 340 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon R5 340 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon 6750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6750M.

Insight	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R5 340 Benchmark Check

Radeon 6750M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 340 and Radeon 6750M

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon 6750M

The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 340 scores 935 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 340 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 340) vs 480 (Radeon 6750M). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M).

Feature	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
G3D Mark Score	935+3%	911
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9085 TFLOPS+58%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB+100%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) vs 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 340 draws 50W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R5 340) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R5 340	Radeon 6750M
TDP	50W	35W-30%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	18.7	26.0+39%

💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.4 (Radeon R5 340) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 2.7% better value. The Radeon R5 340 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).