Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 M445

AMD

Radeon R5 340

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M445

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 M445 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 M445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 M445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

  • 42.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 149.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 152.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M445 instead at 947 vs 935, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 149.3% (9.4 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 M445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 340 scores 935 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 340 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 340) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 920 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 340Radeon R7 M445
G3D Mark Score
935
947+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9085 TFLOPS+54%
0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+22%
920 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
96 KB+20%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 340Radeon R7 M445
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 340Radeon R7 M445
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 340 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R5 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R5 340Radeon R7 M445
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Perf/Watt
18.7
63.1+237%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 340 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 M445 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R5 340 was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 147.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R5 340Radeon R7 M445
MSRP
$99-60%
$250
Performance per Dollar
9.4+147%
3.8
Codename
Lexa
Meso
Release
April 20 2017
May 15 2016
Ranking
#773
#899

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.