CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6750M
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750M is positioned at rank 236 and the Radeon R5 340 is on rank 136, so the Radeon R5 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 340
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 340 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon R5 340 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 340.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $60), it costs 58% less, resulting in a 139.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+139.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750M and Radeon R5 340
Radeon HD 6750M
The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.
Radeon R5 340
The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750M scores 937 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 937 | 935 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.9085 TFLOPS+58% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 96 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 340 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6750M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Perf/Watt | 26.8+43% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 340 costs 58.3% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 37.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 139.7% better value. The Radeon R5 340 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $25-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 37.4+140% |
| Codename | Whistler | Lexa |
| Release | January 4 2011 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #905 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6750M and Radeon R5 340
