
Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 M445

Radeon HD 6750M
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M445
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6750M is positioned at rank 236 and the Radeon R7 M445 is on rank 538, so the Radeon HD 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M445
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M445 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $250), it costs 76% less, resulting in a 312.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+312.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6750M and Radeon R7 M445

Radeon HD 6750M
The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.

Radeon R7 M445
The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6750M scores 937 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 937 | 947+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+50% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.5888 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 80 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6750M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M445 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6750M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon HD 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 80% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 26.8 | 63.1+135% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6750M costs 76% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon HD 6750M offers 310.5% better value. The Radeon R7 M445 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6750M | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-76% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6+311% | 3.8 |
| Codename | Whistler | Meso |
| Release | January 4 2011 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #905 | #899 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















