Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

AMD

Radeon HD 6750M

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6750M

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 300W, a 265W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • 121.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 757.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 121.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6750M instead at 937 vs 921, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon HD 6750M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6750M

The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6750M scores 937 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score
937+2%
921
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
480
4096+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+8206%
ROPs
8
128+1500%
TMUs
24
256+967%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6750M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6750M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6750M and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 158.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6750M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP
35W-88%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
26.8+765%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6750MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP
$139
Codename
Whistler
Navi 48
Release
January 4 2011
July 23 2025
Ranking
#905
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.