
Radeon R5 340

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R5 340
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌40.4% HIGHER MSRP$139 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 340 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 340
The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 340 scores 935 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 340 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 340) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 935+2% | 921 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5166% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2920 MHz+160% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 256+967% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R5 340) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 340 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R5 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+503% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R5 340 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R5 340 was 28.8% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 42.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon R5 340 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-29% | $139 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4+42% | 6.6 |
| Codename | Lexa | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #773 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















