Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
505.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌24% higher power demand at 62W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 496.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 62W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 instead at 948 vs 935, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 496.8% (9.4 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	948+1%	935
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+89%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+167%	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 340 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R5 340
TDP	62W	50W-19%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	178mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	15.3	18.7+22%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R5 340 was 83.5% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 487.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	$599	$99-83%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	9.4+488%
Codename	GF106	Lexa
Release	December 24 2010	April 20 2017
Ranking	#902	#773

Search Quadro 2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.