Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 6750M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (935 vs 911), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 6750M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 6750M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 6750M

The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).

Feature	Radeon 6750M	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	911	935+3%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 6750M	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 6750M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 6750M	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon 6750M	Radeon R5 340
TDP	35W-30%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	26.0+39%	18.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon 6750M	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	Whistler	Lexa
Release	January 4 2011	April 20 2017
Ranking	#905	#773

Search Radeon 6750M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.