Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank 182 and the Radeon R7 240 is on rank 103, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and Radeon R7 240
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911 | 902 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+50% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS+29% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 80 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 6750M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 30W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 30.1+16% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 240 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 65.1% better value. The Radeon R7 240 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $69 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4 | 60.1+65% |
| Codename | Whistler | Oland |
| Release | January 4 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #905 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6750M and Radeon R7 240
