Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240

AMD

Radeon 6750M

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 6750M

2011

Why buy it

  • 3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 35W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 6750M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 6750M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (911 vs 902), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 6750M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 6750M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 6750M

The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240).

FeatureRadeon 6750MRadeon R7 240
G3D Mark Score
911
902
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+50%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS+29%
0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
48 KB
80 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 6750MRadeon R7 240
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 6750M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 6750M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240.

FeatureRadeon 6750MRadeon R7 240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon 6750MRadeon R7 240
TDP
35W
30W-14%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
26.0
30.1+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 240 (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon 6750MRadeon R7 240
MSRP
$69
Codename
Whistler
Oland
Release
January 4 2011
October 8 2013
Ranking
#905
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.