
Radeon 6750M vs Radeon HD 4850

Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank 182 and the Radeon HD 4850 is on rank 237, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4850 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6750M.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (246mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $199), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 666.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+666.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and Radeon HD 4850

Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.

Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911 | 946+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+74% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 160 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 6750M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 4850 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-68% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 246mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+202% | 8.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 87.4% less ($174 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) — the Radeon 6750M offers 658.3% better value. The Radeon 6750M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-87% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4+658% | 4.8 |
| Codename | Whistler | RV770 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #905 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















