CPU
GPU
GRID M6-0B
Popular choices:
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-0B is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon 6750M is on rank 182, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6750M.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $100), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 299.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+299.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-0B and Radeon 6750M
GRID M6-0B
The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 480 (Radeon 6750M). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 911 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+220% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+285% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+1100% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 6750M) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 35W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 26.0+186% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon 6750M offers 300% better value. The GRID M6-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $25-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 36.4+300% |
| Codename | GM204 | Whistler |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #535 | #905 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M6-0B and Radeon 6750M
