GRID M6-0B vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

GRID M6-0B

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-0B

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 979.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,500 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,361 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 989.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (921 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,361 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 989.8% (6.6 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-0B

The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score
912
921
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1536
4096+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+2057%
ROPs
64
128+100%
TMUs
96
256+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-0B and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 100% difference. The GRID M6-0B is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP
100W-67%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
9.1+194%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-0B came in at $1500, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 90.7% cheaper ($1361 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M6-0B) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 1000% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP
$1500
$139-91%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
6.6+1000%
Codename
GM204
Navi 48
Release
August 30 2015
July 23 2025
Ranking
#535
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.