CPU
GPU
GRID M6-0B
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-0B is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon HD 4770 is on rank 149, so the Radeon HD 4770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M6-0B is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GRID M6-0B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4770.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M6-0B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M6-0B holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $109), it costs 8% less, resulting in a 9.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-0B and Radeon HD 4770
GRID M6-0B
The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.
Radeon HD 4770
The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 909 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+131% | 0.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+350% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 4770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 80W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 203mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 11.4+25% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The GRID M6-0B costs 8.3% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the GRID M6-0B offers 9.6% better value. The GRID M6-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $109-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-8% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1+10% | 8.3 |
| Codename | GM204 | RV740 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 28 2009 |
| Ranking | #535 | #908 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M6-0B and Radeon HD 4770
