
GRID M6-0B
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-0B is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon R5 340 is on rank 136, so the Radeon R5 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 340
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-0B.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $100), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 310.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+310.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-0B and Radeon R5 340

GRID M6-0B
The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

Radeon R5 340
The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 935+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+144% | 0.9085 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+500% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R5 340) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 18.7+105% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99 and now averages $25. The Radeon R5 340 costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 37.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 311% better value. The Radeon R5 340 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Radeon R5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $99-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $25-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 37.4+311% |
| Codename | GM204 | Lexa |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #535 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













