GRID M6-0B vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

GRID M6-0B

2015Core: 722 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon HD 6670/7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-0B

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1415.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1471.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (946 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M6-0B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,401 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1471.6% (9.6 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M6-0B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M6-0B vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-0B

The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score
912
946+4%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536+220%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS+285%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+700%
8
TMUs
96+300%
24
L1 Cache
576 KB+1100%
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-0B and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) β€” the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W β€” a 75.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon HD 6670/7670
TDP
100W
45W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Perf/Watt
9.1
21.0+131%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-0B came in at $1500, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670/7670 was 93.4% cheaper ($1401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M6-0B) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) β€” the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 1500% better value. The newer card here is GRID M6-0B (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGRID M6-0BRadeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP
$1500
$99-93%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
9.6+1500%
Codename
GM204
Turks
Release
August 30 2015
January 5 2012
Ranking
#535
#870

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.