CPU
GPU
GRID M6-0B
Popular choices:
Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-0B is positioned at rank 374 and the Quadro CX is on rank 383, so the GRID M6-0B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B
Performance Per Dollar Quadro CX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M6-0B is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GRID M6-0B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro CX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro CX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-0B.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M6-0B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M6-0B holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $500), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 381.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+381.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-0B and Quadro CX
GRID M6-0B
The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 947+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+700% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+380% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-0B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The Quadro CX offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 40% difference. The GRID M6-0B is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1+44% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999 and now averages $500. The GRID M6-0B costs 80% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 1.9 (Quadro CX) — the GRID M6-0B offers 378.9% better value. The GRID M6-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GRID M6-0B | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500-25% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-80% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1+379% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM204 | GT200B |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #535 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M6-0B and Quadro CX
