GRID M6-0B vs Quadro CX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-0B vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M6-0B vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-0B

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$1,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M6-0B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M6-0B makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $1,500 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.3% (0.6 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro CX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M6-0B vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-0B

The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-0B scores 912 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-0B) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score	912	947+4%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1536+700%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS+380%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+167%	24
TMUs	96+50%	64
L2 Cache	2 MB+953%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M6-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-0B and 64-bit on the Quadro CX. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GRID M6-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+953%	0.19 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-0B) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
DirectX	12_1+8%	11.1 (10_0)
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-0B draws 100W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 40% difference. The GRID M6-0B is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-0B) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	9.1+44%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-0B came in at $1500, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, GRID M6-0B was 25% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (GRID M6-0B) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GRID M6-0B offers 20% better value. The newer card here is GRID M6-0B (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GRID M6-0B	Quadro CX
MSRP	$1500-25%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	0.6+20%	0.5
Codename	GM204	GT200B
Release	August 30 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#535	#901

Search GRID M6-0B on Amazon

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.