Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅45.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6670/7670 instead at 946 vs 935, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $99 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.2% (9.6 vs 9.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 340 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	946+1%	935
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	Radeon R5 340
TDP	45W-10%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Perf/Watt	21.0+12%	18.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6670/7670 came in at $99, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 2.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 6670/7670	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	$99	$99
Performance per Dollar	9.6+2%	9.4
Codename	Turks	Lexa
Release	January 5 2012	April 20 2017
Ranking	#870	#773

Search Radeon HD 6670/7670 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.