Radeon HD 6670/7670
VS
Radeon R7 340

Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R7 340

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 340

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon R7 340 is on rank 130, so the Radeon R7 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670

#364
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1136%
#366
1029%
#367
1027%
#371
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
934%
#372
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
927%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
92%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
748%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
718%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
710%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
709%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
707%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
703%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
695%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
686%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
684%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
675%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
674%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
662%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
661%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#115
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
825%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
97%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
95%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6670/7670.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 62.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+62.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670/7670 and Radeon R7 340

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the Radeon R7 340 reaches 960 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 340 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 340). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
G3D Mark Score
946
960+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
1024+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+247%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
48 KB
256 KB+433%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 340's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 300W (Radeon R7 340). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
TDP
45W-55%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Perf/Watt
21.0+119%
9.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 340 launched at $99 and now averages $25. The Radeon R7 340 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 38.4 (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 62.7% better value. The Radeon R7 340 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 6670/7670Radeon R7 340
MSRP
$99
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$25-38%
Performance per Dollar
23.6
38.4+63%
Codename
Turks
Trinidad
Release
January 5 2012
June 18 2015
Ranking
#870
#467