
Radeon HD 6670/7670 vs Radeon R7 M270DX

Radeon HD 6670/7670
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M270DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon R7 M270DX is on rank 372, so the Radeon R7 M270DX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670/7670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M270DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6670/7670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M270DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M270DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670/7670 and Radeon R7 M270DX

Radeon HD 6670/7670
The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

Radeon R7 M270DX
The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6670/7670 scores 946 and the Radeon R7 M270DX reaches 962 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M270DX uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 946 | 962+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.7219 TFLOPS+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 96 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6670/7670 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M270DX's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+64% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 M270DX launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Radeon R7 M270DX costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) vs 48.1 (Radeon R7 M270DX) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 103.8% better value. The Radeon R7 M270DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670/7670 | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-1% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.6 | 48.1+104% |
| Codename | Turks | Topaz |
| Release | January 5 2012 | June 11 2014 |
| Ranking | #870 | #897 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















