Radeon R5 435
VS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Radeon R5 435 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R5 435 is positioned at rank #376 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 435

#366
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1139%
#368
1033%
#369
1030%
#373
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
937%
#374
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
930%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
93%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
91%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
90%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 435 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4044.1% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 435.

InsightRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4044.1%)
Leading raw performance (+4044.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 461.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 435.

InsightRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+461.9%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 435 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 435 scores 762 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 4044.1%. The Radeon R5 435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 435) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 2610 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score
762
31,578+4044%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
320
7680+2300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
40.09 TFLOPS+5982%
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
2610 MHz+153%
ROPs
8
80+900%
TMUs
20
240+1100%
L1 Cache
0.08 MB
7.5 MB+9275%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
48 MB+36823%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R5 435 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 435 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 435) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
12 GB+2300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
504 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
48 MB+36823%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 435) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX
12 (FL 11_1)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 435) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 435) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 3.0
NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 435 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 161.9% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 435) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP
30W-89%
285W
Recommended PSU
350W-50%
700W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
168mm
285mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.4
110.8+336%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 435 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Radeon R5 435 costs 86.4% less ($510 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 463.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R5 435GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP
$80-90%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$80-86%
$590
Performance per Dollar
9.5
53.5+463%
Codename
Jet
AD104
Release
May 15 2016
January 3 2023
Ranking
#922
#11