
Radeon R7 260 vs FirePro W5100

Radeon R7 260
Popular choices:

FirePro W5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $110), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 127.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+127.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260 and FirePro W5100

Radeon R7 260
The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

FirePro W5100
The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260 scores 2,892 and the FirePro W5100 reaches 2,987 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro W5100 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 260) vs 768 (FirePro W5100). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,892 | 2,987+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS+8% | 1.428 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 260 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5100 has 4 GB. The FirePro W5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260) vs 12 (FirePro W5100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.170 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5100). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5100).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260 draws 95W versus the FirePro W5100's 50W — a 62.1% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 260) vs 350W (FirePro W5100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 50W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 173mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 30.4 | 59.7+96% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the FirePro W5100 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The FirePro W5100 costs 54.5% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) vs 59.7 (FirePro W5100) — the FirePro W5100 offers 127% better value. The FirePro W5100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-73% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110 | $50-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3 | 59.7+127% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Bonaire |
| Release | December 17 2013 | March 31 2014 |
| Ranking | #591 | #582 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












