Radeon R7 260
VS
FirePro W5100

Radeon R7 260 vs FirePro W5100

AMD

Radeon R7 260

2013Boost: 1100 MHz
VS

FirePro W5100

2014Core: 930 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5100

#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
95%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
94%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
93%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
90%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
89%
#151
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1972%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
100%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
96%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
96%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
96%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
94%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
93%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
89%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260.

InsightRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)
Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $110), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 127.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+127.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260 and FirePro W5100

AMD

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

AMD

FirePro W5100

The FirePro W5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 31 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,987 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260 scores 2,892 and the FirePro W5100 reaches 2,987 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro W5100 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 260) vs 768 (FirePro W5100). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W5100).

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
G3D Mark Score
2,892
2,987+3%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.536 TFLOPS+8%
1.428 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 260 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5100 has 4 GB. The FirePro W5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260) vs 12 (FirePro W5100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2.170
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5100). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5100).

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260 draws 95W versus the FirePro W5100's 50W — a 62.1% difference. The FirePro W5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 260) vs 350W (FirePro W5100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
TDP
95W
50W-47%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
173mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
30.4
59.7+96%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the FirePro W5100 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The FirePro W5100 costs 54.5% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) vs 59.7 (FirePro W5100) — the FirePro W5100 offers 127% better value. The FirePro W5100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 260FirePro W5100
MSRP
$109-73%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$110
$50-55%
Performance per Dollar
26.3
59.7+127%
Codename
Bonaire
Bonaire
Release
December 17 2013
March 31 2014
Ranking
#591
#582