Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 7600
Radeon R7 260
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 473.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-473.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+473.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $110), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 152.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+152.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260 and Radeon RX 7600
Radeon R7 260
The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 260 scores 2,892 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 473.3%. The Radeon R7 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 260) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,892 | 16,581+473% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1316% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2655 MHz+141% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R7 260 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 260 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R7 260) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 288 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260 draws 95W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 53.8% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 260) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-42% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-27% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 30.4 | 100.5+231% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon R7 260 costs 56% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 152.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-59% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-56% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3 | 66.3+152% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Navi 33 |
| Release | December 17 2013 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #591 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 260 and Radeon RX 7600
