Radeon R7 260 vs Quadro K1200
Radeon R7 260
Popular choices:
Quadro K1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $110 (vs $184), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 63.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($184) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260 and Quadro K1200
Radeon R7 260
The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260 scores 2,892 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 260) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,892 | 2,965+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS+45% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+6% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 260 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 has 4 GB. The Quadro K1200 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260 draws 95W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 71.4% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 260) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 45W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.4 | 65.9+117% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300 and now averages $184. The Radeon R7 260 costs 40.2% less ($74 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) vs 16.1 (Quadro K1200) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 63.4% better value. The Quadro K1200 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-64% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-40% | $184 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3+63% | 16.1 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GM107 |
| Release | December 17 2013 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #591 | #586 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 260 and Quadro K1200
