Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon R7 260
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 333.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-333.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+333.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $110), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 128.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 260.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+128.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon R7 260
The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 260 scores 2,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 333.4%. The Radeon R7 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 260) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,892 | 12,535+333% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+492% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1777 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2.5 MB+1216% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 260 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R7 260) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260 draws 95W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 31.1% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 260) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 66°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-27% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 66°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 30.4 | 96.4+217% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Radeon R7 260 costs 47.4% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 128.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-56% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-47% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3 | 60.0+128% |
| Codename | Bonaire | GA106 |
| Release | December 17 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #591 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 260 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
