
Radeon R7 370 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 370.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $51), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 2.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($51) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,482 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS | 2.462 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1275 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 65W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8 | 69.2+54% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 2.4% better value. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $99-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $51 | $50-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.9 | 90.0+2% |
| Codename | Trinidad | Baffin |
| Release | June 18 2015 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #467 | #478 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















