
Radeon R7 370

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Radeon R7 370 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 370 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 370 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50.5% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 30.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Radeon R7 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 370 vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,482 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS | 2.462 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1275 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 370 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 65W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8 | 69.2+54% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 370 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 (móvel) was 33.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.1 (Radeon R7 370) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 51.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $99-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 45.5+51% |
| Codename | Trinidad | Baffin |
| Release | June 18 2015 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #467 | #478 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















