Radeon R7 370 vs Tesla K40c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 370 vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 370 vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5052.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 245W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5067.1% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 30.1 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌145% higher power demand at 245W vs 100W.
❌20.8% longer card at 267mm vs 221mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K40c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (4,495 vs 4,482), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,550 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5052.2% (30.1 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K40c still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 370 vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	4,482	4,495
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2880+181%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.997 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+153%
Boost Clock	975 MHz+11%	876 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	256 KB+7%	240 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12+9%	11_0
Max Displays	3	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 84.1% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
TDP	100W-59%	245W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	221mm	267mm
Slots	2	2
Perf/Watt	44.8+145%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 370 came in at $149, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, Radeon R7 370 was 98.1% cheaper ($7550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.1 (Radeon R7 370) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 4916.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 370 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 370	Tesla K40c
MSRP	$149-98%	$7699
Performance per Dollar	30.1+4917%	0.6
Codename	Trinidad	GK180
Release	June 18 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#467	#465

Search Radeon R7 370 on Amazon

Search Tesla K40c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.