Radeon R7 370 vs Tesla K40c
Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K40c is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 370.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $51 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 877.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+877.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($51) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 370 and Tesla K40c
Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 370 scores 4,482 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 370) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,482 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2880+181% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS+153% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz+11% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+7% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 370) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 370 draws 100W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 84.1% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R7 370) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-59% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8+145% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699 and now averages $500. The Radeon R7 370 costs 89.8% less ($449 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) vs 9.0 (Tesla K40c) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 876.7% better value. The Radeon R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 370 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-98% | $7699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $51-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.9+877% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Trinidad | GK180 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #467 | #465 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 370 and Tesla K40c
