Radeon R7 A10-7800 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank #488 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800

#477

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2276%

#479

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2063%

#480

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2058%

#484

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1871%

#485

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1858%

#487

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#488

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

100%

#489

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#490

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#491

Radeon HD 6450A

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

99%

#492

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#493

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

98%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

95%

#495

Radeon HD 8180

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

94%

#498

Radeon R8 M535DX

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#499

Radeon R5 230

MSRP: $50|Avg: $25

93%

#500

GeForce 9300 GE

MSRP: $23|Avg: $25

93%

#501

Mobility Radeon HD 5450

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

92%

#502

Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 963.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-7800.

Insight	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-963.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+963.4%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 325.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 A10-7800.

Insight	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+325.4%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 A10-7800 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 963.4%. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	740	7,869+963%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	35.87 TFLOPS+1102%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2335 MHz+40%	1665 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB	896 KB+17%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7800	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	180W	75W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	4.1	104.9+2459%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 324.7% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).