Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 A365

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 A365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 A365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅4.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
129.4% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A365

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8850 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.8% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A365 instead at 781 vs 773, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A365 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $141 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 131.7% (7.2 vs 3.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A365 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 A10-8850 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 A365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 scores 773 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 A365
G3D Mark Score	773	781+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8192 TFLOPS+29%	0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 A365
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 A365
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 A365
TDP	55W	30W-45%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	14.1	26.0+84%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A10-8850 came in at $250, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A365 was 56.4% cheaper ($141 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the Radeon R7 A365 offers 132.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8850 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 A365
MSRP	$250	$109-56%
Performance per Dollar	3.1	7.2+132%
Codename	Cape Verde	Opal
Release	July 6 2016	January 9 2014
Ranking	#667	#890

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A365 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.