Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4810

2009

Why buy it

✅18.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 258.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌245.5% higher power demand at 190W vs 55W.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 190W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4810 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
257.1% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4810 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.7% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (775 vs 773), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4810 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4810 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 258.1% (11.1 vs 3.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4810

The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

Feature	Radeon HD 4810	Radeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score	775	773
Architecture	TeraScale	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+56%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.36 TFLOPS+66%	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	160 KB+25%	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 4810	Radeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4810 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850.

Feature	Radeon HD 4810	Radeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 110.2% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 4810	Radeon R7 A10-8850
TDP	190W	55W-71%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	246mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	95	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	14.1+244%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4810 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4810 was 72% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 258.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8850 (2016 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 4810	Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP	$70-72%	$250
Performance per Dollar	11.1+258%	3.1
Codename	RV790	Cape Verde
Release	April 2 2009	July 6 2016
Ranking	#762	#667

Search Radeon HD 4810 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.