GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 4810
GRID M10-0Q
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0Q is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon HD 4810 is on rank 113, so the Radeon HD 4810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GRID M10-0Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4810.
| Insight | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (246mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4810 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 873.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+873.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0Q and Radeon HD 4810
GRID M10-0Q
The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon HD 4810 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 796+3% | 775 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+23% | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4810) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 246mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 190W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 246mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5 | 4.1+17% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 875.5% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $70-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $15-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 51.7+875% |
| Codename | GM107 | RV790 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #622 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-0Q and Radeon HD 4810
