GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 4810

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 4810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 4810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 246mm, a 245mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2757.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌18.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 190W.

Radeon HD 4810

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,930 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2681.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 225W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24500% longer card at 246mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-0Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (796 vs 775), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4810 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,930 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2681.8% (11.1 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4810 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 4810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

Radeon HD 4810

The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon HD 4810 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
G3D Mark Score	796+3%	775
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640	800+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+23%	1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	320 KB+100%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4810. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4810) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
DirectX	12_1+19%	10.1
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 246mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
TDP	225W	190W-16%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	246mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	95
Perf/Watt	3.5	4.1+17%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4810 was 96.5% cheaper ($1930 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 2675% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0Q (2016 vs 2009).

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 4810
MSRP	$2000	$70-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	11.1+2675%
Codename	GM107	RV790
Release	May 18 2016	April 2 2009
Ranking	#622	#762

Search GRID M10-0Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.