GeForce GT 635 vs GRID M10-0Q
GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 635 is positioned at rank 152 and the GRID M10-0Q is on rank 389, so the GeForce GT 635 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M10-0Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 635 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-0Q.
| Insight | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 635 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 635 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 663.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+663.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 635 and GRID M10-0Q
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
GRID M10-0Q
The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the GRID M10-0Q reaches 796 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the GRID M10-0Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 640 (GRID M10-0Q). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 810+2% | 796 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 640+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+95% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+10% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+120% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 635) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the GRID M10-0Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce GT 635 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (GRID M10-0Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 200W-43% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0+14% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The GeForce GT 635 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) vs 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 664.2% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-95% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-87% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.5+664% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM107 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #618 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 635 and GRID M10-0Q
