GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 A8-7500

GRID M10-0Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 A8-7500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 A8-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0Q

2016

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1900% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1937.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (811 vs 796), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1937.7% (8.1 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 A8-7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7500

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon R7 A8-7500 reaches 811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon R7 A8-7500
G3D Mark Score
796
811+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+34%
975 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB+25%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon R7 A8-7500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7500) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon R7 A8-7500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7500's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon R7 A8-7500
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
3.5
8.1+131%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon R7 A8-7500 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7500 was 95% cheaper ($1900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 8.1 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) — the Radeon R7 A8-7500 offers 1925% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0Q (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP
$2000
$100-95%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
8.1+1925%
Codename
GM107
Trinidad
Release
May 18 2016
June 18 2015
Ranking
#622
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.