GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 7670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1900% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 7670

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1917.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (803 vs 796), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1917.6% (8.0 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 7670
G3D Mark Score	796	803
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+33%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+190%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+567%	48 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 7670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7670) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 7670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 7670
TDP	225W	45W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	3.5	17.8+409%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7670 was 95% cheaper ($1900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 8.0 (Radeon HD 7670) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 1900% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0Q (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 7670
MSRP	$2000	$100-95%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	8.0+1900%
Codename	GM107	Turks
Release	May 18 2016	January 5 2012
Ranking	#622	#870

Search GRID M10-0Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.