
GRID M10-0Q

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GRID M10-0Q vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-0Q vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M10-0Q vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-0Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021Why buy it
- ✅GRID M10-0Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-0Q vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0Q
The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 796 | 800 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+3900% | 16 |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1450 MHz+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. GRID M10-0Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5 | 53.3+1423% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 18 2016 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #622 | #917 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















