GRID M10-0Q vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GRID M10-0Q

225

796

0.0%

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

15

800

+0.5%

Arc A310

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-0Q is positioned at rank #389 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q

#374

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

36932%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

100%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

95%

#391

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

95%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

87%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

80%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

80%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

77%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

75%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

60%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

60%

#400

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

60%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

57%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

57%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-0Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-0Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M10-0Q Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0Q and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score	796	800
Architecture	Maxwell	Gen. 12
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	640+3900%	16
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	1450 MHz+11%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-0Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The GRID M10-0Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP	225W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	3.5	53.3+1423%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).