GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 A365

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0Q is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon R7 A365 is on rank 412, so the GRID M10-0Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q

#374

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

36932%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

100%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

95%

#391

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

95%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

87%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

80%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

80%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

77%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

75%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

60%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

60%

#400

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

60%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

57%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

57%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365

#402

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1514%

#404

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1373%

#405

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1369%

#409

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1245%

#410

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1236%

#412

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

100%

#413

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

99%

#417

Arc 8-Core iGPU

MSRP: $503|Avg: $400

97%

#418

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

96%

#419

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

96%

#420

Radeon R9 M385

MSRP: $300|Avg: $60

96%

#421

Radeon R5 235

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

96%

#422

Radeon R9 M375X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#423

Radeon HD 6620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

95%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#425

Radeon HD 7690M XT

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#426

Radeon HD 7600G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

93%

#427

Radeon R7 A265

MSRP: $149|Avg: $149

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-0Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A365.

Insight	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A365 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A365 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $150), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 167.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+167.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($55)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M10-0Q Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A365 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0Q and Radeon R7 A365

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
G3D Mark Score	796+2%	781
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+164%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+58%	825 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A365) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
DirectX	12_1	12 (FL 12_0)
Max Displays	0	3

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 A365
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	3.5	26.0+643%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109 and now averages $55. The Radeon R7 A365 costs 63.3% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 14.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the Radeon R7 A365 offers 167.9% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).