GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 5670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1920.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5670

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1930.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (800 vs 796), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,901 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1930.4% (8.1 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

Radeon HD 5670

The Radeon HD 5670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon HD 5670 reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 5670). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5670). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 5670
G3D Mark Score	796	800
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+62%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+48%	880 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	96+140%
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 5670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5670. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5670) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 5670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 5670's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-0Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 5670
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	3.5+9%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 5670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5670 was 95% cheaper ($1901 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 8.1 (Radeon HD 5670) — the Radeon HD 5670 offers 1925% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0Q (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon HD 5670
MSRP	$2000	$99-95%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	8.1+1925%
Codename	GM107	Cayman
Release	May 18 2016	December 14 2010
Ranking	#622	#596

Search GRID M10-0Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.