GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

GRID M10-0Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-0Q

2016

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1240% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (800 vs 796), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1240% (5.3 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual).

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
G3D Mark Score
796
800
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
768+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 11_2 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
DirectX
12_1+9%
11_2
Max Displays
0
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
3.5
16.0+357%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-0Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual was 92.5% cheaper ($1850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual) — the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual offers 1225% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-0Q (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID M10-0QRadeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual
MSRP
$2000
$150-93%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
5.3+1225%
Codename
GM107
Release
May 18 2016
August 1 2013
Ranking
#622
#881

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.