
Radeon HD 4810

Radeon R7 A365
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A365 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A365 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4810
2009Why buy it
- ✅24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 190W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4810 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌55.7% HIGHER MSRP$109 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A365 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 781 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+115% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4810 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (FL 12_0)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4810) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4810) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 145.5% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 30W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 246mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 26.0+534% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4810 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4810 was 35.8% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 54.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A365 (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-36% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1+54% | 7.2 |
| Codename | RV790 | Opal |
| Release | April 2 2009 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #762 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














